Welcome to Law and Disorder Radio
Law and Disorder is a weekly independent civil liberties radio program airing on more than 150 stations and on Apple podcast. Law and Disorder provides timely legal perspectives on issues concerning civil liberties, privacy, right to dissent and practices of torture exercised by the US government and private corporations.
Law and Disorder June 2, 2025
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Placeless: Homelessness in the New Gilded Age
Homelessness in the USA has reached catastrophic proportions. In New York City alone 125,000 people are homeless. One out of eight children in public school are homeless. Shelters for homeless people are overflowing. Many sleep outside or in the subway system. Their conditions of life have driven many of these people over the edge.The problem is long-standing and quite evident.
There’s a lack of affordable housing. Why? Because building affordable housing is not as profitable as building luxury housing. How realistic is it to get money for affordable housing when the oligarchy in power lacks empathy and only seeks to enrich itself, shift money from the bottom to the top, and poor people have very little political clout in the two party system.
Guest – Patrick Markee is a prominent advocate and policy analyst known for his extensive work on homelessness in New York City. He worked at the Coalition for the Homeless for several decades. Markee’s forthcoming book Placeless: Homelessness in the New Gilded Age pinpoints systemic factors such as economic and equality, housing affordability, and policy decisions that have perpetuated homelessness since the regular administration 40 some years ago.
—-
Silencing Those Speaking Out Against The US-Israel War In Palestine
All across this country, academic freedom is under severe attack. Why? Well, at colleges and universities, professors and students who dare to speak out in defense of the Palestinian people and condemn Israel’s genocidal war against the Palestinian people, have been censored, disciplined, fired, deported, and arrested. Universities are told who they can hire and what they can teach under the threat of the cut-off of grant money. This is so that, in our ever more authoritarian country, centers of opposition can be brought into line, as they were in Germany. And these attacks on academic freedom are not limited to actions by university administrators, but include those by the federal government, as well.
Visiting scholars, adjuncts and lecturers without tenure have had their contracts terminated, or haven’t been renewed. Some had their classes suddenly cancelled. Faculty members who espouse views contrary to official U.S. policy vis-a-vis the Israeli-U.S. war in Palestine have been criticized in ways that have trampled on their reputations and hurt their careers. As an excuse for this present-day McCarthyism, college and university administrators, and President Trump, often claim their censorious actions are undertaken only on behalf of ensuring their Jewish students feel “safe” on campus and to fight so-called “anti-Semitic speech and actions” on campus. But there is a distinct lack of evidence to support their claimed motivation. In fact, the largest pro-Palestinian actions on campuses are often organized by Jewish groups, such as Jewish Voice for Peace.
We ask our guest Professor Alan Wald about McCarthy-styled witch hunts against academic personnel, and learn how federal law is being misused as a mechanism of political repression against academia. We’ll also discuss the role that controversy over slogans such as those condemning Zionism play in this new attack on academic freedom, and what strategies are best employed today by the opponents of Israel’s war in Gaza against these attacks, as the ever more deadly Israeli-U.S. war in Palestine continues.
Guest – Professor Alan Wald, the H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professor Emeritus at the University of Michigan…which, I might add, is my alma mater. Professor Wald has authored nine books related to today’s topic. He has been a socialist scholar since the 1960’s, and is currently an editor of the journal Against the Current, as well as a member of the editorial board of Science and Society. Professor Wald is also a founder of the University of Michigan’s Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine committee.
———————-
Law and Disorder May 26, 2025
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes
Today, Republicans are the ruling party in the United States. They control the presidency, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. But they also control the Supreme Court, which is the one institution that is supposed to oversee the legality and constitutionality of what the other two branches do. The Supreme Court has a super majority of six conservative justices, all of whom were appointed by Republican presidents, and three of whom were appointed by Donald Trump himself.
We are joined today by Prof Leah Litman, the author of a compelling and timely new book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes. Prof Litman’s premise is that the “the Supreme Court is repeatedly elevating the feelings, sentiments, and political views of the Republican Party” and that the conservative justices consistently reach pre-ordained results that strictly conform to the Republican platform and then they justify those outcomes using high-minded judicial language to give the patina of objectivity. She points out that “Republican-appointed justices seem to think that the real victims of discrimination today are the Republicans, who no longer enjoy the kind of outsize influence, political power, and social standing they once did.”
Guest – Leah Litman is a professor of law at the University of Michigan and a former law clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy. She is a co-host of the popular podcast Strict Scrutiny and she received the Ruth Bader Ginsberg award for “scholarly excellence” from the American Constitution Society.
—–
US Supreme Court Revokes Legal Protection of Venezuelan Nationals
In an emergency order issued on May 19, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to revoke legal protections that the Biden administration had granted to hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan nationals.
Only one justice publicly dissented: Ketanji Brown Jackson. Just days earlier, at a legal conference, Jackson delivered the Court’s strongest public rebuke yet of Trump-era attacks on judges who have blocked Trump’s policies on immigration, halting federal grants and contracts, and firing government workers. Her 18-minute speech earned a standing ovation.
In January, the Trump administration announced plans to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelan nationals—a designation that shields individuals from deportation due to civil unrest and unsafe conditions in their home country. The U.S. has seen a sharp rise in its Venezuelan population, driven by mass displacement stemming from Venezuela’s ongoing political, economic, and humanitarian crises.
Earlier, on March 31, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen issued a nationwide injunction blocking the termination of TPS, preserving protections for an estimated 350,000 Venezuelans and allowing them to continue working legally until at least October 2026, or until the legal challenge was resolved. Judge Chen raised concerns that the administration’s move may have been discriminatory and lacked a sound legal basis. The National TPS Alliance.
Guest – UCLA law professor Ahilan Arulanantham is a leading civil rights attorney and former MacArthur Foundation Fellow. Before joining UCLA, he spent nearly two decades at the ACLU of Southern California, the last two as Senior Counsel. He previously served as a federal public defender in Texas, and clerked on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Widely recognized for his work defending immigrant rights, he has twice been named California Lawyer of the Year and is a multiple-time honoree on the Daily Journal’s Top 100 Lawyers list.
————————————
Law and Disorder May 19, 2025
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Jewish Voice For Peace
As Israel’s expanding genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank continue, with more than 47,000 confirmed deaths and many more unconfirmed killed, the Trump administration continues its unconditional military support of Israel, while waging its own war at home against the movement for Palestinian rights. Trump has intensified his attacks by labeling pro-Palestinian protests as “antisemitic” and using that excuse to cancel student visas, deport pro-Palestinian activists, and revoke federal grants to major universities.
Guest – Professor Barry Trachtenberg serves on the Academic Board of Jewish Voice for Peace and the Institute for the Critical Study of Zionism. He holds the Rubin Presidential Chair of Jewish History at Wake Forest University in North Carolina. He is a historian of modern European and American Jewry, and the author of three books on the Holocaust and the revolutionary roots of modern Yiddish.
—-
DOGE: Targeted Purge And Deferred Resignation
A growing coalition of lawmakers, labor unions, and community advocates is rallying against what they call an “illegal and anti-democratic” takeover of the federal workforce. Members of the American Federation of Government Employees recently joined Senators and Representatives on the steps of the Office of Personnel Management in Washington. They demanded the removal of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency—known as DOGE—from federal authority. Their message was clear: DOGE is dismantling merit-based civil service protections under the guise of “efficiency,” threatening thousands of federal workers in the process.
The rally spotlighted the damage already done—more than 175,000 federal workers have been laid off or pressured into “deferred resignation.” Most of those affected, including more than 50,000 veterans, are victims of targeted purges that circumvent due process. Courts have already ruled against DOGE in over 25 cases, though legal battles continue as DOGE seeks expanded access to agency data and systems.
AFGE and its allies argue that DOGE’s agenda is not rooted in actual reform, but in political cronyism. Musk’s directives, which include replacing experienced civil servants with political loyalists and eliminating oversight roles like inspectors general. AFGE President Everett Kelley called DOGE a symbol of “blatant disdain” for the federal workforce in his four decades of union service.
Baltimore People Power Assembly and The Harriet Tubman Center For Social Justice
Guest – Alec Summerfield, is staff counsel of the National VA Council at the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO. He is also an anti-Zionist Jewish advocate for Palestinian rights. We’ll hear how his background informs his activism and why AFGE’s resistance to DOGE is part of a broader movement to defend democracy and protect public service from authoritarian erosion.
—————–