Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Gaza, genocide, Human Rights, Right To Dissent, Targeting Muslims, U.S. Militarism, War Resister, worker's rights
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Oligarchs and Billionaires Reshape Economic-Political Landscape
We’re living at a time of profound changes in the institutions that previously governed our society. One hundred years ago V.I Lenin, the leader of the Russian Revolution, observed that sometimes nothing changes for decades and at other times decades-long changes occur within several days.
This is what is happening now in America as the old institutions, the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, the universities, the media, the government, including Congress, governmental agencies, the elite law firms, educational institutions and most recently long-standing tariff policy are being reconfigured as instruments of authoritarian rule.
More than 800 billionaires form the upper crust in America. Three people alone own as much as the entire bottom, half of the population. Democracy, the rule of the people, however aspirational, no longer prevails. We have become an oligarchy, a majority of our people ruled by a relative handful. Our institutions have rapidly changed to reflect this new reality.
We are governed by an amoral man who’s only interest is in power and money, which is another form of power.
Guest – Professor Henry A. Giroux, author of many books and articles, including most recently a piece in Counterpunch titled Abducting Bodies, Silencing Dissent : Mamoud Kailil and the Rise of State Terrorism. Professor Giroux currently holds the McMaster University Chair for Scholarship in the Public Interest in the English and Cultural Studies department and is the Pablo Frère, Distinguished Scholar in Creative Pedagogy. Henry Giroux has authored many books, most recently with Anthony DiMaggio, titled, Fascism on Trial: Education, and the Possibility of Democracy.
—-
Critical Media Update: War Made Invisible
With respect to the Israeli/U.S. war in Gaza, peace talks limp along; Israel has accelerated its war in Gaza and the West Bank; and recent remarks by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and president Donald Trump, make it clear that both countries intend, if they can do it, to ethnically cleanse all of the Palestinian people from Palestine, thereby bringing about the expected end result of their genocidal war on the Palestinian people.
Meanwhile here in the United States, President Trump has seized upon the claim of rampant anti-Semitism on our nation’s college and university campuses to deport non-U.S. citizen leaders in the movement on the campuses in support of the Palestinian side in the war, and to withhold tens of millions of dollars from the campuses until they eliminate the “anti-Semitic atmosphere on our campuses.” And, according to our guest today, press reporting in the mainstream media on the war has been less than clear and balanced.
Guest – Norman Solomon is the co-founder of RootsAction.org and Executive Director of the Institute for Public Accuracy, and is, in fact, the author or co-author, of 12 books, most touching on today’s topic in either close or tangential ways. His books include War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. The paperback edition of his latest book, “War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine,” includes an afterword about the Gaza war.
—————————-
Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Gaza, genocide, Human Rights, Targeting Muslims, War Resister
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Taxpayers Against Genocide
The Israeli genocide in Gaza continues without any end in sight, resulting in the slaughter of over 50,000 Palestinians, with over 113,000 wounded. Meanwhile, the United States is escalating its support for Israel. Donald Trump is sending obscene amounts of military aid to Israel to help fuel the extermination of the Palestinian people, while threatening to take over the Palestinian homeland and turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
But most Americans disapprove of Trump’s handling of the war in Gaza; support for Israel in the United States is at the lowest its been in 25 years and support for the Palestinians is up 6 points since last year. About 60% of Americans support a ceasefire in Gaza.
So the question is what can be done to restrain the US government from its costly, illegal, and inhumane support for Israel’s war in Gaza?
Taxpayers Against Genocide – TAG- has an answer. TAG is a grassroots mass movement comprising of over 1,000 U.S. taxpayers. Countless federal tax payers repeatedly called, emailed, petitioned and peacefully protested their congressional representatives and U.S. government officials to stop using their tax dollars to fund what had become clear was a genocide in Gaza. After almost one year of having their congress members refuse to meet or consider their constituents’ pleas, a group of Northern California taxpayers formed TAG in fall 2024 and filed a federal class action lawsuit arguing that it is illegal to use tax dollars for genocide. But the case was dismissed on February 10th, 2025.
Undaunted, TAG is not giving up. On February 19th TAG launched a National Call to Action. With the support of National Lawyers Guild attorneys, on the day this program will be broadcast, April 7th, 2025, TAG will submit a comprehensive report to the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and on April 30th, TAG will file an official complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Guest – Attorney Margaret DeMatteo is a movement lawyer and former class member of Donnelly et al. v. Thompson, et al. , a class action brought by the grassroots Northern CA group Taxpayers Against Genocide. She is currently working on an imminent submission to the United Nations Human Right Council’s Universal Periodic Review of the United States, based on its complicity in the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
Guest – Attorney Huwaida Arraf is a Palestinian American attorney and human rights activist. She is a co-founder of the International Solidarity Movement, supporting Palestinian popular resistance on the ground in the occupied Palestinian territory and also an organizer with the Freedom Flotilla to break the siege on Gaza. In the US, she practices civil rights law and is an active member of the National Lawyers Guild.
—-
The Dangerous Militarization of AI and the Profiteering Behind It
A recent exposé by investigative journalist Peter Byrne, titled One Ring to Rule them All, and published by Project Censored, reveals the unsettling extent of Silicon Valley’s deepening ties to the military-industrial complex. Byrne traces the rise of Palantir Technologies—founded with seed money from the CIA and ominously named after the all-seeing stone in Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. Today, Palantir stands as a $200-billion powerhouse, fueling AI-driven military operations across the globe.
Byrne’s investigation uncovers how Palantir and its sister company Anduril Industries, has built an AI weapons consortium that appears to skirt antitrust laws, monopolize Pentagon contracts, accelerate the militarization of artificial intelligence, and bypass essential democratic oversight. His reporting lifts the curtain on the hidden architecture of autonomous weapons systems and exposes Silicon Valley’s quiet but profound military takeover. At the heart of the story is a troubling shift: AI systems that could soon make life-and-death decisions without human intervention.
Byrne also draws a sobering parallel between today’s AI-fueled war economy and the era of the Gilded Age robber barons. But this time, the stakes are even higher—not only economic inequality, but also the global proliferation of algorithmic warfare. His work raises a critical question: Are we witnessing the construction of a 21st-century “Ring of Power” capable of dominating both markets and militaries?
Guest – Peter Byrne is a veteran investigative reporter with decades of experience uncovering the dark intersections of Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and the ever-expanding military-industrial complex. His work, frequently featured by Project Censored and other independent outlets, has consistently exposed the hidden mechanisms behind surveillance, privatization, and unchecked corporate power.
——————
Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Gaza, genocide, Human Rights, Targeting Muslims, Violations of U.S. and International Law
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
The Silencing of Genocide Critics
The International Court of Justice, known as the World Court, found it plausible that Israel was committing genocide against the Palestinian people living in Gaza. Thereafter the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defense minister Yoav Gallant.
Since October 8, 2023 Israel has murdered, on an industrial scale, upwards of 70,000 people and reduced most of the Gaza strip to a pile of rubble. They used American bombs and received American diplomatic cover and financial aid. On March 18, 2025, Israel unilaterally broke a recent cease-fire killing 400 people, including 174 children, in one night. Israel is carrying out the final stage of the genocide. The people living in Gaza will either be deported or killed.
The philosopher Hannah Arendt wrote “ The death of human empathy is one of the earliest and most telling signs of a culture about to fall into barbarism.“ Israel has fallen. It is a profound historical truth, as Mark Twain observed 100 years ago, that you can’t have imperialism abroad and a republic at home. The Democratic rights that we citizens of the United States hold are being suppressed here as an illustration of this maxim.
American partnership with Israel’s war has worked to destroy our liberal universities here at home. It started with the trustees at Columbia University totally surrendering the universities academic freedom, self government, and free speech in return for the promise by the Trump administration of restoring $400 million in federal funding. Columbia has been more than compliant in hopes that they’ll get the money.
Using the pretext of providing security for their Jewish students, American universities across the country enforce the silencing of critics of the ongoing genocide. They have not fought back to preserve the integrity of their institutions and the freedom of their students.
Law and Disorder: The Hundred Years’ War On Palestine Interview
Guest – Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi is a Palestinian American historian of the Middle East, the Edward Said professor of Modern Arab Studies at Columbia University, and Director of the Middle East Institute of Columbia School of International and Public Affairs. He was educated at Yale and Oxford universities and is the author of many books on the Middle East. He is also the author of Under Siege: PLO Decision Making During the 1982 War, Brokers of Deceit: How the US Has Undermined Peace in the Middle East and recently The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017.
—-
Is The Trump Administration Upholding The Bedrock Of America’s Democracy?
On March 3rd, the American Bar Association issued a statement titled, The ABA rejects efforts to undermine the courts and the legal profession. They called upon the Trump Administration to adhere to four major principles of law that have, they say, “guided our country for more than 200 years.” The four principles are: to defend judges and the courts; to acknowledge the role of the courts; to adhere to the rule of law; and to respect the separation of powers and the three co-equal branches of government with distinct duties and responsibilities. These principles have, they state, been the “bedrocks of American democracy.” The ABA statement accuses the Trump administration of violating these principles in several ways. Law and Disorder co-host Stephen Rohde takes our guest seat to evaluate whether the Trump Administration is upholding, or violating the principles that the ABA calls “the bedrock of America’s democracy.”
Guest – Stephen Rohde is a writer, lecturer and political activist. For almost 50 years, he practiced civil rights, civil liberties, and intellectual property law and has won significant First Amendment victories in state and federal appellate courts. He is a past chair of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California and past National Chair of Bend the Arc, a Jewish Partnership for Justice. He is a founder and current chair of Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace; member of the Board of Directors of Death Penalty Focus, and a member of the Black Jewish Justice Alliance. Mr. Rohde is the author of the books
American Words of Freedom: The Words That Define Our Nation and Freedom of Assembly plus numerous articles and book reviews on civil liberties and constitutional history for the Los Angeles Review of Books, American Prospect, LA Times, Ms. Magazine, Los Angeles Lawyer, LA Progressive, and Truthdig
.
—————————–
Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Criminalizing Dissent, Freedom Of Speech, Gaza, genocide, Human Rights, War Resister
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Federal Court Challenges to Trump Administration Arguments
The number of active lawsuits in federal courts challenging Trump administration arguments has now topped 100. In 21 of those cases, judges have already issued temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions, effectively stopping, at least for now, parts of Trump’s agenda.
For example, as reported in the New York Times this past Sunday, trial court judges have blocked for now Trump’s mass firings of civil servants, Musk’s access to sensitive federal agency data, the relocation of transgendered women inmates to men’s prisons, the pursuit of immigrants inside houses of worship, and the freezing of up to $3 trillion of federal funding to the states. And in a very important case, a federal judge entered a final judgment reinstating the head of the federal watchdog agency. And just yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled against the Trump Administration halting the sending out of those billions of foreign aid dollars.
But it must be pointed out that in a number of preliminary victories against Trump’s actions, the government, though losing the first round in the case, have nevertheless stalled in obeying the court’s orders. And Trump, himself, posted the absolutist notion that, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”
Five of the judges who have ruled against Trump were appointed by Republican presidents, one by Trump himself. As a result of Trump’s losing record in court cases so far, there is now talk on the right of seeking to impeach judges who rule against the Trump Administration. And the number of death threats judges are experiencing from the public have gone up alarmingly, as well.
Guest – Stephen Rohde is a civil rights activist, author, and constitutional scholar. He practiced civil rights law for almost 50 years. He currently serves as chair of the Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace (aka ICUJP), which was formed in the wake of 9/11 for the purpose of organizing faith-based communities to call for an end to war and violence. He is also a past President of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, and past Chair of Death Penalty Focus, and Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice. Despite that long list of affiliations, today he’s not speaking on behalf of any of those organizations.
—-
Free Speech Protections Threatened Under Trump Administration
On March 4, 2025, President Donald Trump threatened to cut federal funding to colleges that permit what he calls “illegal protests.” This statement on social media has sparked a wave of reactions from civil rights groups as a direct attack on fundamental freedoms such as speech and assembly.
In his post, Trump echoed ideas from previous executive orders, including his 2019 order and one issued in January, which specifically targeted pro-Palestinian student protests on college campuses, calling them antisemitic. But Trump’s latest comments go further, asserting that any protest deemed illegal would lead to harsh consequences, including the imprisonment of agitators and expulsion or arrest of American students. The details, however, remain unclear, particularly around how the government would define “illegal protests” or the enforcement of such measures.
Trump’s latest threat has reignited concerns about the balance between freedom of speech and government intervention on college campuses. It also raises important questions about the rights of students, faculty, and protesters in the context of broader political and social movements.
Guest – Attorney Mara Verheyden-Hilliard from the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund and the Center for Protest Law and Litigation in Washington, DC. Mara is one of the nation’s leading litigators defending protesters and winning numerous reforms in police practices at mass assemblies and demonstrations.
———————–
Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Gaza, Human Rights, Illegal Immigration
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Trump Executive Orders Erasing Protections For Underclass
This is the first week of Black History Month, and we at the Law and Disorder show are eager to celebrate it. But that’s not what’s happening in the Trump administration. The Defense Department under the headline “Identity Months Dead at DoD” has eliminated various Heritage Months, including Black History Month. Meanwhile, the Defense Intelligence Agency has “paused” the recognition of Black History Month.
Even more alarming is Trump’s Executive Order eliminating the use of D.E.I., that is “diversity, equity and inclusion”, as factors to be considered by all federal agencies when hiring their employees. Trump claims the elimination of DEI will result in America becoming a “colorblind and merit-based society.” However, DEI programs do not hire less qualified applicants for jobs, they simply require governmental agencies to seek out well-qualified minority and women candidates for all job openings. That is, to remove any discriminatory barriers that result in hiring fewer well-qualified women and minorities, and the disabled, in their work force. Margareet Huang, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s president and chief executive got it right when she said, “His (Trump’s) attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion—are just a sanitized substitute for the racist comments that can no longer be spoken openly.”
Meanwhile, and closely related to Trump’s attack on DEI, are his multifaceted attacks on immigrants and in particular those who join in public protests against his policies, such as his policies on Israel and Palestine.
For many years, and especially after October 7, 2023, as a way to stifle demands for Palestinian human rights and sovereignty, there has been a concerted effort to conflate criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism. Now Trump has upped the ante. On January 29, he pledged to deport non-citizen college students, and others, who take part in pro-Palestinian protests, and promising “immediate action” by his Justice Department to prosecute such protesters. He issued a warning to all the resident immigrants who join in what he called “the pro-jihadist protests,” warning that “we will find you, and we will deport you.” He threatened to cancel the foreign student visas of what he labeled “Hamas sympathizers on college campuses, which have been infested with radicalism like never before.”
To implement these sweeping threats, Trump issued an Executive Order titled “Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism.” Among other things, the order reaffirms Executive Order 13899 that Trump issued on December 11, 2019, during his first term. It required all executive departments and agencies charged with enforcing anti-discrimination laws to consider the highly controversial “working definition” of anti-Semitism adopted in 2016 by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), including eleven “Examples of Anti-Semitism.”
On May 1, 2024, the House of Representatives on a 320-91 bipartisan vote, passed the Antisemitism Awareness Act. It would enshrine the very same flawed IHRA “working definition” in federal law. It now goes before the Senate. On January 21, without even waiting for the Act to become law, Harvard University set a dangerous precedent by agreeing to adopt the IHRA definition as part of a settlement of two federal lawsuits that had accused the school of failing to do enough to prevent antisemitic discrimination.
Guest – Stephen Rohde is a civil rights activist, author, and constitutional scholar. He currently serves as chair of the Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace (aka ICUJP), and he is also a past President of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, and past Chair of Death Penalty Focus and Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice.
—————————————-
Academic Freedom, Censorship, Freedom Of Speech, Gaza, genocide, Human Rights, Targeting Muslims
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
The First Amendment And TikTok
On January 17, for the first time in modern American history, a unanimous US Supreme Court upheld a sweeping prior restraint on free speech imposed by Congress banning over 170 million users in the United States from having access to the popular social media platform TikTok that the Court itself admitted “allows users to create, publish, view, share, and interact with short videos overlaid with audio and text.” In 2023 alone, U. S. TikTok users uploaded more than 5.5 billion videos, which were in turn viewed more than 13 trillion times around the world. The avoid the ban, the law requires TikTok’s parent company, the China-based ByteDance, to divest its ownership.
From January 18 to 19, the ban was in effect for about 12 hours until Donald Trump tweeted that as President he would grant a stay of execution, pending a potential sale of TikTok. It was only 12 hours some may say, but it is estimated that during that time the ban blocked 6,750,000 videos that would have been viewed over 178,000,000 times worldwide. The ban is easily the most extensive act of censorship in human history.
Shortly after he was sworn in, Trump signed an Executive Order purporting to suspend the ban for 75 days. Serious questions have been raised whether Trump’s order is legal and enforceable. And despite his order, Apple and Google have still not reinstated TikTok at their stores preventing new subscribers from accessing TikTok.
Meanwhile, the First Amendment rights of 170 million TikTok users hang in the balance.
Guest – Ramya Krishnan is a senior staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and a lecturer in law at Columbia Law School. Her litigation focuses on issues related to government transparency, protest, privacy, and social media. Ramya co-authored the Knight Institute’s amicus brief in TikTok. v. Garland, one of the lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the TikTok ban which resulted in the Supreme Court’s decision. Read Amicus Brief
—-
Federal Court Rejects Attempt To Remove Ethnic Studies Curriculum
As Israel’s war in Gaza and the West Bank rages on, the free speech battles here in the United States continue with Congress, state legislatures and college administrators trying to silence pro-Palestinian protests by conflating criticism of Israel with the odious epithet of “antisemitism.” Pro-Palestinian groups are being banned, students are being disciplined, and faculty members are being suspended and fired.
But last November, there was some hopeful news when a federal court rejected attempts by Jewish parents and teachers to remove an ethnic studies curriculum from the Los Angeles Unified School District that they had labelled “antisemitic” and “anti-Zionist.”
On November 30, 2024, in a 49-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Fernando M. Olguin wrote that a system of education “which discovers truth out of a multitude of tongues” must allow teachers and their students “to explore difficult and conflicting ideas.” He added that “we must be careful not to curb intellectual freedom by imposing dogmatic restrictions that chill teachers from adopting the pedagogical methods they believe are most effective,”
The ruling represents a welcome rebuke to the efforts of Republican state legislators and conservative parent groups to try to restrict the teaching of comprehensive American history in public schools, to ban books that examine that history as well as racism, sexism, and LGBTQ issues, and to eliminate programs that seek to ensure diversity, equity, and inclusion in American education.
In 2022, a group calling itself “Concerned Jewish Parents and Teachers of Los Angeles,” comprised of what the lawsuit calls Jewish, Zionist teachers and parents of students sued the Los Angeles Unified School District; United Teachers of Los Angeles; its president Cecily Myart-Cruz; the Liberated Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum Consortium; Theresa Montaño, the Consortium’s secretary; and Guadalupe Carrasco, its co-founder.
To discuss the important free speech and academic freedom issues involved in this case, we’ve invited the lawyer who represented the ethnic studies curriculum, Ms Montano and Ms Carrasco.
Guest – Mark Kleiman is a former activist and organizer and a long-time civil rights and human rights attorney. With extensive experience in whistleblower protection, he has brought cases that exposed massive fraud against public programs and has forced drug companies, nursing home chains, and defense contractors to repay hundreds of millions of dollars. Since 2019 he has devoted thousands of hours to defending activists, scholars, and students who have been attacked for their defense of Palestinian human rights.
————————-
