Welcome to Law and Disorder Radio
Law and Disorder is a weekly independent civil liberties radio program airing on more than 150 stations and on Apple podcast. Law and Disorder provides timely legal perspectives on issues concerning civil liberties, privacy, right to dissent and practices of torture exercised by the US government and private corporations.
Law and Disorder March 16, 2020
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Basic Legal Rights For Animals: Activists and Advocates
Discussions over whether animals are sentient beings, capable of feeling pain, pleasure or suffering, date back as far as ancient thinkers such as Plutarch, Hippocrates and Pythagoras. They all advocated for the fair treatment of animals. The term animal rights stands for the proposition that non-human animals have the right to be treated, not as property, but rather as the individuals they are, with their own desires and needs.
Animal law is now widely taught in law schools across North America. There are 167 law schools in the U.S. and Canada, and 11 in Australia and New Zealand, teaching courses in animal law. Several legal scholars support extending basic legal rights and to personhood to non-human animals.
Critics of animal rights argue that nonhuman animals are unable to enter into a social contract, and thus cannot have rights. Another argument is that animals may be used as resources as long as they don’t undergo unnecessary suffering.
Certain forms of animal rights activism, such as the destruction of fur farms and animal labs by the ALF or Animal Liberation Front, have also attracted criticism, and prompted Congressional reaction by enacting of harsh laws allowing these activities to be prosecuted as terrorism. These laws include the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act.
Guest – Attorney Tamara Bedic, chairperson of the National Lawyers Guild Animal Rights Project. She is a graduate of the University of Virginia School of Law and a masters degree from Columbia University-NY University. Tamara practices employment law with a focus on women and harassment in the workplace.
Guest – Phillip Murphy, Philip Murphy is a writer and social justice activist based in the Greater New York City area. He is a co-founder of the Buddhist Action Coalition NYC, a pan-Buddhist social justice organization, and is also a co-founder of the New York chapter of UK-based Animal Rebellion, a global climate and animal justice movement. His recent article, Why Animal Justice is Crucial in Addressing the Climate Emergency was published at the independent global media platform openDemocracy.net. SHAC 7 Documentary
——————————–
——————————–
Law and Disorder March 9, 2020
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
COVID-19 Virus And History of Quarantine
“Quarantine” is a state, period, or place of isolation in which people or animals that have arrived from elsewhere or who have been exposed to infectious or contagious disease are placed.
As Law & Disorder taped this show in early March 2020, thousands of people around the globe are being quarantined as governments rush to keep the COVID-19 virus from spreading. In China, for example, thousands were forced into mass quarantine centers. And entire cities and towns in Italy were put on lock-down, sending an estimated 100,000 persons into quarantine.
In the United States, quarantines are being readied for some first responders. Two dozen emergency workers are being monitored for possible exposure to the coronavirus. And 27 firefighters and two police officers were quarantined in Washington State.
Today on Law and Disorder we’ll examine the civil liberties aspects of quarantines and other government responses to pandemics.
The word quarantine, and the practice, dates back to the Middle Ages. It was first used in English in 1617 to refer to the 40 days a ship suspected of carrying a contagious disease was detained offshore in isolation.
But the first instance of the institutionalized practice of quarantine actually occurred in the 14th century when the Bubonic plague, also referred to as Black Death, devastated Europe from 1347 to 1352, killing approximately 20 million people.
Authorities in Venice were the first to formalize the protective action after the plague began spreading there in 1347. Ports were closed to ships and travelers who had to spend 40 days in isolation.
In the early days of the United States local and state jurisdictions were responsible for protection against contagious diseases. After a 1793 yellow fever epidemic struck Philadelphia and killed 5,000, the city created a 10-acre quarantine station called the Lazaretto along the Delaware River.
With outbreaks of yellow fever, Congress passed the National Quarantine Act in 1878 marking the federal governments involvement with quarantine activities. The quarantine system was fully nationalized by 1921, according to the CDC.
- Open Letter From Public Health And Legal Experts
- Immigration Policies Weaken Ability To Fight Coronavirus
- Why CDCs Power To Quarantine Should Worry Us
Guest – Professor Wendy Parmet from Northeastern Law School is a leading expert on health, disability and public health law and directs the law school’s Center for Health Policy and Law and its JD/MPH programs. She holds a joint appointment with Northeastern’s School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs in recognition of her national leadership in interdisciplinary thinking and problem solving on health care issues. Wendy co-edits the law school’s SSRN online publications, Human Rights and the Global Economy and the Northeastern University School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Paper Series. In 2016, Wendy was honored with the prestigious Jay Healey Health Law Teachers Award by the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
—-
COVID-19: Public Health Experts Urge US Government To Ensure Scientifically Based Response Plan
A group of more than 450 public health experts recently urged government leaders to enact scientifically-informed policies to mitigate the effects of the Covid-19 coronavirus in the U.S. They called for fair and equitable imposition of such policies.
According to the ACLU, the experts’ recommendations, sent in a public letter, will help ensure a response plan that protects the health, safety, and civil liberties of all. It’s generally accepted that during a disease outbreak, individual rights may have to cede to give way to the greater good. But that is only if science supports the need for such measures, which may include isolation and quarantine.
In their letter, the public health experts ask officials, for example, to work with insurance companies to ensure that lack of insurance and high costs are not a barrier to testing and treatment. They call for health care facilities to be dubbed “immigration enforcement-free zones” — a step used before during hurricanes and other emergencies. And they seek extra help for under-resourced hospitals and community health centers.
Also impacted are minimum-wage workers and others who live on the economic margins, can’t telecommute, and can’t afford to lose their jobs. The experts also stress that leaders need to scrupulously ensure that their public messages are accurate and guided by science and not politics. In the past many responses to emergencies have been hindered by politics, including China’s response to the SARS coronavirus outbreak in 2003.
Guest – Jay Stanley, Senior Policy Analyst at the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project at the ACLU in Washington, DC.
——————————
——————————
Law and Disorder March 2, 2020
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017
There has been a century of war on the Palestinians by Zionists whose goal was to establish a Jewish state on their land.
More than 100 years ago, a Zionist Congress meeting in Vienna sent a delegation of several rabbis to Palestine to report back on what they saw. The rabbis telegraphed: “The bride is beautiful but she is married to another man.“
That is to say, Palestine was already settled by Palestinians who have been there for centuries. Thus the project of the Zionists was to ethnically cleanse Palestine by any means necessary.
It has taken 100 years and six declarations of war and the settler colonial project of the Zionists has been largely successful, so far. Three years ago President Donald Trump put his young son-in-law Jared Kushner in charge of American policy towards the Palestinians. Without consulting them last month Trump announced what he called “the deal of the century“.
The “deal” gave Israel large parts of the west bank of the Jordan River which embraced territory illegally conquered by Israel in the war they started in 1967 and where 600,000 Israelis have been settled since then.
The Palestinians were given several non-contiguous enclaves in the West Bank plus the Gaza Strip and told that those who were displaced in the 1947-48 War and the 1967 war could never come back to the land the Zionists claim was given to their ancestors by a God thousands of years ago. They were told they have four years to accept the offer.
We speak with Rashid Khalidi about his just published landmark history
Guest – Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University. He is also the author of Under Siege: PLO Decision Making During the 1982 War, Brokers of Deceit: How the US Has Undermined Peace in the Middle East and recently The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017. Professor Khalidi’s article on the Sabra and Shatila massacre in The Nation magazine.
—-
Venezuelan Embassy Protection Collective Update 2020
In a violation of international law, on May 16, 2019 more than 100 police, many with military gear, invaded the embassy of Venezuela in Washington, DC and arrested four Embassy Protectors who were in the embassy with the permission of the Venezuelan government to protect it from takeover as part of a US coup against the elected Venezuelan government of Nicolas Maduro.
The United States had at that time attempted to install Juan Guida as the president of Venezuela and Guida’s right wing supporters attempted to take over the Venezuelan embassy in Washington DC. Under international law, the embassy is the property of Venezuelan government and is considered untouchable.
The US had attempted to install Juan Guaida as the president of Venezuela and on May 30th right wing coup supporters attempted to take over the Venezuelan embassy in Washington DC. This coincided with another attempted coup by Juan Guaida in Venezuela. Guaido failed in his coup attempt.
The embassy in Washington, DC is the property of Venezuela and under international law the United States must protect and is not allowed to enter it.
A group of Americans known as the Embassy Protection Collective moved into the embassy to prevent its hostile takeover. Up to 70 people were sleeping in the embassy as embassy protectors.
The State Department, Secret Service, and the Metropolitan police force allowed a pro-coup mob to lay siege on the embassy. People were blocked from entering the embassy. Food was prevented from being brought in. The electricity and water were cut off.
Although the coup against the Maduro government failed, the Embassy Protectors were arrested when the US government raided the Venezuelan embassy. The final four Embassy Protectors, Kevin Zeese, Margaret Flowers., Adrian Pine, and David Paul were arrested and face federal prosecution. If convicted they could be imprisoned up to one year and fined up to $100,000 each.
Guest – Kevin Zeese is a US lawyer and political activist. He helped organize the 2011 Occupy encampment in Washington DC. Kevin Zeese is currently the co-director of The Organization Popular Resistance.
———————-
———————-